Anthropic's Request to Delay AI Copyright Trial Denied
Anthropic has been denied a request to delay a groundbreaking trial set for December, which will address whether the company is liable for billions in damages for using pirated books to train its AI models. This decision was reported by Bloomberg Law.
The US District Court for the Northern District of California rejected Anthropic's attempt to pause the lawsuit, emphasizing that the current record does not resolve key factual issues. Judge William Alsup noted that Anthropic has not clarified which pirated works were used and why they were retained after the company transitioned to purchasing and scanning books.
The court had previously ruled that training AI on copyrighted works could be considered fair use, but left the piracy issue to be decided by a jury. Anthropic sought to appeal this decision and the class certification of authors whose books were included in the pirated libraries. However, the judge argued that an appeal would be more informed after the trial concludes, potentially exposing Anthropic to significant financial liability.
We hope you enjoyed this article
Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.
Also, consider following us on social media:
More from Regulation
Oct 16 HKMA Introduces ART Framework for AI Use in Banking Oct 15 UK Medicines Regulator Plans AI Safety Tools by 2030 Oct 15 OpenAI Agrees Not to Use Apple Trade Secrets During Lawsuit Oct 15 Financial Stability Board Publishes 12 AI Practices for Financial Firms Oct 15 Singapore Launches Three AI Safety InitiativesAI Policy Brief
Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.
Whitepaper
Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?
Tensordyne
This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.
Read moreYou may also like
AI Companies Face Antitrust Lawsuit Over Slowdown Calls
NYC Comptroller Urges Anthropic to Pause IPO
US Appeals Court Upholds Thomson Reuters Win in AI Training Case
Anthropic Cuts Internet Access for Internal AI Evaluations
Anthropic Warns AI Agents Could Create Uncertain Legal Liability
Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.