Democracy Forward Sues Federal Agencies Over AI Transparency as Senate Advances NDAA with AI Provisions
On October 1, the Democracy Forward Foundation filed a complaint in the US District Court for the District of Columbia against the Office of Personnel Management, General Services Administration, Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Office of Management and Budget. The lawsuit alleges that these agencies failed to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests submitted in June and July seeking records about the use of artificial intelligence in federal rulemaking and regulatory processes. The complaint claims the agencies acknowledged receipt but did not provide the requested information within the required timeframe.
The filing highlights concerns over the federal government’s use of AI tools in administrative and regulatory functions without sufficient transparency. It references instances such as the use of AI to summarize public comments and develop regulatory planning tools. The case raises questions about whether delegating certain rulemaking tasks to AI systems aligns with the Administrative Procedure Act’s requirements for public participation and reasoned decision-making. The agencies have 30 days from service to respond to the complaint.
Separately, on October 9, the US Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2026, which includes multiple AI-related provisions. The legislation establishes a cross-functional team to create a standardized framework for evaluating Department of Defense AI models and mandates assessments of all major systems by January 2028. It also calls for the creation of an Artificial General Intelligence Steering Committee to deliver a defense adoption strategy by April 2026.
The Senate bill includes measures to integrate AI into logistics, mission planning, and cybersecurity operations, as well as initiatives to strengthen domestic AI infrastructure. Among the amendments retained is the Guaranteeing Access and Innovation for National Artificial Intelligence Act of 2026, requiring chipmakers to prioritize domestic customers before exporting advanced semiconductors. The NDAA passed in a 77–20 vote and now proceeds to a conference committee to reconcile differences with the House version.
We hope you enjoyed this article
Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.
Also, consider following us on social media:
More from Regulation
Oct 16 HKMA Introduces ART Framework for AI Use in Banking Oct 15 UK Medicines Regulator Plans AI Safety Tools by 2030 Oct 15 OpenAI Agrees Not to Use Apple Trade Secrets During Lawsuit Oct 15 Financial Stability Board Publishes 12 AI Practices for Financial Firms Oct 15 Singapore Launches Three AI Safety InitiativesAI Policy Brief
Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.
Market report
2025 Generative AI in Professional Services Report
Thomson Reuters
This report by Thomson Reuters explores the integration and impact of generative AI technologies, such as ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, within the professional services sector. It highlights the growing adoption of GenAI tools across industries like legal, tax, accounting, and government, and discusses the challenges and opportunities these technologies present. The report also examines professionals' perceptions of GenAI and the need for strategic integration to maximize its value.
Read moreYou may also like
OpenAI Urges US to Lead Global AI Standards
White House AI Pact Asks Companies to Police Themselves
Australia Calls OpenAI and Anthropic CEOs to Senate AI Inquiry
Altman and Amodei urge UN to adopt international AI standards
OpenAI and Anthropic Support Mandatory AI Breach Reporting in Australia
Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.