Indian Experts Call for Domestic AI Safety Framework
Industry experts say India should create an AI safety framework suited to its languages, scale and focus on AI applications, according to a PTI report published by ET BFSI. They cautioned against directly copying the voluntary White House Accord on Super Intelligence signed on September 29 by major US technology companies.
NASSCOM Chairman Srikanth Velamakanni called for binding requirements covering transparency, incident reporting and accountability for serious harm. Other experts supported a hybrid approach that would apply mandatory rules to uses in areas such as defense, health care, banking and government, while allowing voluntary standards for rapidly changing technical issues.
Suggested safeguards include testing before deployment, independent audits, named responsibility for AI risks and reliable performance across Indian languages and cultural contexts. Experts identified deepfakes, cyberattacks, fraud, privacy breaches and attacks on critical infrastructure as key risks, though some favored self regulation to avoid limiting competition.
We hope you enjoyed this article
Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like AI Policy Brief or Daily AI Brief.
Also, consider following us on social media:
More from Regulation
Oct 6 OpenAI to Watermark ChatGPT and Codex Text in EU Oct 6 Former Anthropic Researcher Jacob Coxon to Testify at New York City AI Hearing Oct 5 Agility Robotics CEO Peggy Johnson Joins Defense Study Oct 5 China SCO Platform Unveils AI Agent and Six Digital Projects Oct 5 TIER IV Plans Autonomous Bus Tests in Saudi ArabiaAI Policy Brief
Weekly report on AI regulations, safety standards, government policies, and compliance requirements worldwide.
Whitepaper
Tensordyne Napier: What If One Rack Could Do the Work of Nine?
Tensordyne
This Tensordyne whitepaper presents Napier, an inference-focused AI processor and rack-scale system based on the company’s TDN Math logarithmic number system. It examines infrastructure requirements for large mixture-of-experts and agentic models, compares major inference architecture approaches, and details the TDN AIP processor, TDN72 pod, TDN Link fabric, and Napier Ultra configuration. The paper reports simulation-based performance, cost, and accuracy-validation results, including Tensordyne’s projected comparison of one Napier rack with a nine-rack Nvidia Rubin plus Groq deployment; the chip is reported as taped out and in fabrication.
Read moreYou may also like
OpenAI Chief Scientist Calls for Slower AI Scaling
Altman and Amodei urge UN to adopt international AI standards
Bill Gates Calls for Federal AI Regulation
European AI Firms Reject Calls to Slow Model Development
EAIGG and Draup Introduce National AI Readiness Scorecard
Daily AI Brief: the AI news that matters, in your inbox.