Castle Biosciences to Present New Data on DecisionDx-Melanoma at EADO and ACMS Meetings
Castle Biosciences announced in a press release that it will present new clinical data on its DecisionDx-Melanoma test at the 22nd European Congress of Dermato-Oncology in Prague and the American College of Mohs Surgery Annual Meeting in Austin. The studies focus on identifying early-stage melanoma patients at greater risk of recurrence and poor outcomes.
At the European Congress of Dermato-Oncology, data from a multi-center cohort of 1,817 patients with stage I to III cutaneous melanoma showed that DecisionDx-Melanoma provides independent prognostic information beyond American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. The test improved five-year recurrence risk prediction when combined with staging and identified biologically high-risk patients within early-stage disease.
At the American College of Mohs Surgery meeting, a population-based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry found that the test can identify molecularly high-risk T1 melanoma patients with lower five-year melanoma-specific survival. When combined with staging, it identified more patients who died from melanoma than stage III classification alone.
DecisionDx-Melanoma is a gene expression profile test that analyzes tumor biology to provide personalized risk assessments for patients with stage I to III cutaneous melanoma. It has been clinically validated in more than 10,000 samples and ordered over 230,000 times since launch.
We hope you enjoyed this article.
Consider subscribing to one of our newsletters like Life AI Weekly or Daily AI Brief.
Also, consider following us on social media:
More from: Life Sciences
Subscribe to Life AI Weekly
Weekly coverage of AI applications in healthcare, drug development, biotechnology research, and genomics breakthroughs.
Whitepaper
AI and the Law: Discussion Paper
This discussion paper explores the intersection of artificial intelligence and legal frameworks, addressing potential legal challenges posed by AI's autonomy, adaptiveness, and opacity. It examines issues such as liability gaps, causation, and the potential for granting AI systems legal personality, aiming to foster further discussion on AI's impact on law reform.
Read more